I experienced more of the latter than the former while reading Alan Watts' Tao: The Watercourse Way. I'm sure it's just me. It came highly recommended on Amazon, so perhaps I just wasn't in the mindset to wander and ruminate with the author.
Alan Watts, the British author who came to California in the 60s and became a kind of a hippie guru, has written extensively on Zen Buddhism. This was his only foray, I believe, into Taoism. He uses each chapter to explore an aspect of Taoism, whether it be the difficulties of translating from the Chinese, or what wu-wei could mean, the yin-yang polarity, or the Taoist conception of virtuality. However, when presenting the information or concept, he pulls in references from all sorts of places -- from Thoreau to Zen writings to Confucianism -- in an academic way. It reminded me of a book I read years ago about Emily Dickinson, which read like a scholar's exploration in abstraction, but lacked any sort of point. Give me the point, please.
Sadly, Mr. Watts died before completing this book, so perhaps it lacked a fair amount of editing. Or perhaps this is just how he wrote. In any case, his co-author, Al Chung-liang Huang contributed an additional chapter, but the book, to me, felt incomplete. But like I said, it did come highly recommended, so it probably is me.
No comments:
Post a Comment